It Is Not Marriage Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and wellbeing of the spouses.
Couples are denied their rights, which has ramifications from child custody to driver licenses to death certificates. Look at what the status quo means: Gay couples separated in hospitals. Losing their life savings when one passes away.
Having a marriage license revoked when they cross state lines.
What is the Supreme Gay marriage arguements for against and thinking about marriage? They just heard oral argument from gay couples, from the states that want to preserve their bans, and from the U. And we can make a couple guesses about what's going through their heads.
First, a few basics. There are nine justices. Conventional wisdom is that four are sympathetic to marriage equality. Four are probably opposed. And one is probably somewhere in the middle. The ones who are opposed are really opposed, starting with Scalia.
He said marriage equality amounts to "a requirement of action which is unpalatable to many of our citizens for religious reasons. But, of course that's ridiculous. Yeah, there are nondiscrimination laws that require businesses to treat customers equally. But, he's mixing up non-discrimination laws with the First Amendment, which protects private religious acts.
Religious officials can choose who to associate with in private. But this case is about the government. And the government, which has to represent everyone, can't pick and choose who the law protects.
Justice Roberts also seemed to be coming down against marriage equality.
You're not seeking to join the institution, you're seeking to change what the institution is. The fundamental core of the institution is the opposite-sex relationship and you want to introduce into it a same-sex relationship. This is also ridiculous. I don't know much about straight couples.
But I'm pretty sure they don't give Valentine's Day cards that say, "My favorite thing about you is that you're the opposite sex. But the states are continuing to cling to this idea that marriage has to be about the ability to reproduce.
According to John Bursch, the states' attorney, granting marriage equality for gays and lesbians would mean " marriage and children don't have anything to do with each other ," and that means we would have "more children outside of marriage.
This is the same argument that the anti-gay side made two years ago in the Windsor case. And how did that work out for them?
|Join: Albert Einstein & you||People were divided into groups of supporters and opponents of such practice.|
|Tap here to turn on desktop notifications to get the news sent straight to you.|
Only Alito and Thomas signed on to that reasoning with Windsor. The other seven didn't buy it. Speaking of Alito, during this most recent argument, he brought up polygamy as a reason to deny marriage equality.
He asked, in essence: If we're going to let gays and lesbians get married, why not groups of people?
This comes up a lot, and it can be a hard question to answer. But the easiest response is that plural marriage is just way more complicated, so it's a much larger shift than simply letting gays and lesbians marry.
For example, if one member of the group divorces, do any of the remaining spouses get child custody? If there's a disagreement over medical care in an emergency, which spouse has more authority? These are questions that could be answered, but polygamy simply isn't at issue in this case.
In part because plural marriages are just as heterosexual as they are queer. You could easily ask, "Doesn't straight marriage lead to polygamy?On June 26, , the US Supreme Court ruled that gay marriage is a right protected by the US Constitution in all 50 states.
Prior to their decision, same-sex marriage was already legal in 37 states and Washington DC, but was banned in the remaining Ten Arguments From Social Science Against Same-Sex Marriage By Family Research Council.
A large and growing body of scientific evidence indicates that the intact, married family is best for children. Five Arguments for Gay Marriage 1. Joshua Bowman on July 12, Emboldened and energized by Justice Anthony Kennedy’s scathing and intellectually dishonest ad hominem attacks in his ruling overturning the Defense of Marriage Act at the federal level, advocates of same-sex marriage are campaigning to put the definition of marriage up to a.
Mar 04, · Alan keyes sets people strait on the issue of gay marriage in a debate with Barack Obama. Apr 29, · The Top Arguments for and Against Same-Sex Marriage at the Supreme Court There are consequences to waiting.
Couples are denied their . The last time the Supreme Court reviewed gay marriage cases was in October, and it declined to take any up.
At that time only 19 states had marriage equality; now that number is at 36, said Charles Joughin, national press secretary for the Human Rights Campaign, a .